> My current comment had nothing to do with the superiority of systemd... Agreed. I never said otherwise. > Please do not take an attempt to get people to try

> My current comment had nothing to do with the superiority of systemd... Agreed. I never said otherwise. > Please do not take an attempt to get people to try out a cool Linux desktop and make it into a systemd vs openrc war. I did no such thing. If I had had other examples of your habit of making statements about the technical superiority of a particular thing, then either failing to back them up with concrete examples or walking back your assertions with the statement "Oh, well the technical side of that doesn't even matter to me anyway.", then I would have used them. :) It's a pity that you mis-read my request for technical details about the technical merits of Fedora's new SAT-solver based package manager dependency resolver as a commentary on the state of Linux init systems. > ...you are take a fairly innocuous statement like... Context is everything, friend. :) To the remainder of your comment: * If you're not familiar with other examples of a given class of software, then you're not qualified to make unqualified statements that a particular instance of that class of software does something better than all the rest. * Microsoft's Office Open XML format is an ISO standard. That doesn't mean that it is any good or that the process that standardized it is without flaw. :)