4 ms·
Then you'd know it's not that the evidence presented at trial would remain sealed but that he wouldn't even be able to present it.
by fineman 11y ago
Then you'd know it's not that the evidence presented at trial would remain sealed but that he wouldn't even be able to present it.
- caskance 11y agoThat's within the context of it being a trial open to the public.
- Alupis 11y ago> That's within the context of it being a trial open to the public. Which the US Government is not allowing. We've looped back to the beginning here... and you still don't understand, don't accept, or don't know the entire narrative.
- fineman 11y agoNo, he won't be able to present evidence at any trial. It's much more than keeping some testimony sealed.