It's a common feature. IIRC, in Cisco WLC land the feature is referred to as active rogue containment: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobil

It's a common feature. IIRC, in Cisco WLC land the feature is referred to as active rogue containment: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/70987-rogue-detect.html#Determination http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/... As someone who has experienced the fallout firsthand from a neighboring tenant in a downtown Seattle office building who used it, I'd challenge the idea that there are valid reasons to do this. If you control the physical network - don't allow rogue APs on your network. If you control the client and care about them connecting to access points that aren't under your control, then manage that instead.