2 ms·
I think that was a perfectly valid change, frankly. Acting like a full time employee and claiming the tax and pay perks of a contractor was obviously not the in
by chillydawg 11y ago
I think that was a perfectly valid change, frankly. Acting like a full time employee and claiming the tax and pay perks of a contractor was obviously not the intent of the law.
- sofaofthedamned 11y agoI'm 50/50 on it. Was a contractor at the time and it was a blunt hammer instrument that denied me the benefits a multinational would get when I plainly wasn't a disguised employee. It's like with the tax credits thing at the mo - I think people would stomach the cuts more if the government was as ravenous about squeezing large multinationals as the smaller guy.