3 ms·
Complex problem made simple sends computer scientists wild
- WalterSear 11y agoBabai declined to be interviewed about the work, saying it must first stand up to the scrutiny of peer review. “I understand that in the internet age, even a simple seminar announcement can trigger an explosion in the blogosphere, but this is no reason to compromise the process,” he says. “The reaction of colleagues at this point is not celebration but anticipation. The results need to be verified by the research community. I say, bravo.
- notacoward 11y agoI came here to say the same thing, but you beat me to it. It's awesome that Babai has used this moment in the spotlight to deliver a message about respect for the scientific process. What class.
- i573323 11y agoNow THAT's a clickbaitey title.
- intrasight 11y agoAnd it worked - I clicked it
- brianclements 11y agoI agree too, if I was allowed to editorialize I would have sterilized it.
- uremog 11y agoWhat these Computer Scientists do next will amaze you!
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- 0xdeadbeefbabe 11y ago> Babai’s new result says that solving graph isomorphism takes slightly longer than polynomial time – not quite placing it in P, but significantly shifting the needle for the first time. What is the needle and how did it shift significantly for the first time? Edit: They already knew it was in NP, but now they know it is not in P (or not quite in P)?
- andreasvc 11y agoAll of P is in NP. The result claims that it is close to P, when before it was probably expected to be much harder than P.
- poizan42 11y agoIf it was proven that it's not in P then we would have shown that P!=NP which would be HUGE. No, this is "merely" finding a more efficient algorithm for a problem which we still don't know exactly where belongs. From a complexity theoretical viewpoint nothing is changed. It's still possible that graph isomorphism is in P. Now if graph isomorphism is shown to be NP-complete then this result would imply that every problem in NP can be solved in sub-exponential time which would have huge practical consequences.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]