yeah but that's the problem exactly with the article, which is that there is no incompatibility with automated, greenhoused, hi-tech, and sustainable, local, or

yeah but that's the problem exactly with the article, which is that there is no incompatibility with automated, greenhoused, hi-tech, and sustainable, local, organic farming. They are compatible. Given that, local and organic (not the label, but the true meaning, which is things grown in living and decaying matter, not awash in chemicals and subsidized by non-renewable, fossil fuel based supplements) The argument is that conventional mass production farming is superior to local, hands-on, organic farming. I don't think this is true, but I know a lot of pretty deeply invested corporations that would like it to be true.