3 ms·
Cmix is lossless data compression aimed at optimizing compression ratio
- edent 11y ago> At least 32GB of RAM is recommended to run cmix. Youch! I totally get what they're trying to do here and that one day even the cheapest toy will have 10x that RAM. But still...
- DannyBee 11y agoConsidering it is is 30-300x slower as its nearest competitors, ram is your smallest problem ;-) (see http://mattmahoney.net/dc/text.html http://mattmahoney.net/dc/text.html) Note that sadly, decompression is equally as slow, so it doesn't even make a lot of sense for something that is "compress once, distribute billions of times".
- dllu 11y agoThe aim of cmix is to use as many context mixing models as is necessary to get the best possible compression ratio as an academic exercise. Little attempt was made to make it faster or use less memory. That said, the author recently communicated to me an idea to make it use orders of magnitude less memory. Instead of running all the context models in one pass while storing all their states, one could run each model in a separate pass, so that only the memory for one context model needs to be stored at any point in time. Since the original program was not multithreaded, this does not affect the running time. Unfortunately that requires rewriting the whole thing and he is preoccupied with other projects at the moment.
- cba9 11y ago> cmix has surpassed the winning entry of the Hutter Prize (but exceeds the memory limits of the contest)...cmix uses a similar neural network architecture to paq8l. cmix uses a four layer feedforward network with 414,273 neurons (paq8l uses a three layer network with 3,633 neurons). This is something I've suspected for a while: the Hutter Prize has become obsolete. I agree with the 'prediction is intelligence' paradigm, but the Hutter Prize cannot show any meaningful progress in AI for the simple reason that the corpus is too small and the resource limits are too stringent. 4 layers with 414k neurons is nowhere near what deep learning researchers use to create intelligent systems. You couldn't fit char-rnn into the Hutter Prize constraints! At this point, all the prize incentivizes is finding an algorithm which fits into the allotted resources, no matter how dumb and inferior that algorithm is to the state of the art which requires more resources to run. Bit-twiddling to optimize the current approaches may be fun for a certain kind of people, but it's hard to see how the contest has contributed at all to progress in AI in the past decade, which was the original purpose. Perhaps what is necessary is a Hutter Prize 2: expand the corpus to the modern English Wikipedia (not one from a decade ago), perhaps add in other language corpuses to increase it further to get a multi-gigabyte corpus, and then increase the resource limits drastically (32GB RAM for starters so cmix can get in), and shut down the old one for diminishing returns. A desktop machine these days can certainly support a decent amount of RAM and computation (on Newegg, you can get a desktop tower refurb with 32GB Ram for <$1000), so there's no cost excuse if one can afford to offer thousands of euros as a prize...
- pg_is_a_butt 11y agowhat is their weissman score?
- Cognitron 11y agowhat's its weissman score?