> Their product testing is inadequate.[1] Did we read the same article? That article has _nothing_ to do with their product testing. It has everything to do wi

> Their product testing is inadequate.[1] Did we read the same article? That article has _nothing_ to do with their product testing. It has everything to do with Prop 65 and labeling. To quote TFA: > But legalities and press releases aside, from a practical health perspective, none of this may matter: as Soylent notes, Prop 65's guidelines are notoriously stringent, pulling many everyday products into its labeling regime — and outside California, there are other more broadly accepted sets of lead and cadmium guidelines that the product meets. ...? > Their outsourced fulfillment operation loses orders.[2] Present tense.. they _had_ major shipping and supply problems at launch. They don't seem to anymore.