4 ms·
If you believe in free speech I don't see how this would be any more bizarre and alarming doing it on taxpayer-funded land than anywhere else? In fact it would
by gozo 11y ago
If you believe in free speech I don't see how this would be any more bizarre and alarming doing it on taxpayer-funded land than anywhere else? In fact it would be more appropriate since freedom of speech primarily protect you from government intervention.
- sonthonax 11y agoBecause if it was private land, reporters would not necessarily have the right to be there.
- gozo 11y agoMakes more sense. I though he meant why they were "questioning free speech, while being on taxpayer-funded land", rather than "questioning the right to deliver free speech in a public space".