3 ms·
I've become convinced that gmail's goal is not to improve email, but to extinguish and replace it. This article talks about one minor aspect of that. In addit
by qewrffewqwfqew 11y ago
I've become convinced that gmail's goal is not to improve email, but to extinguish and replace it. This article talks about one minor aspect of that. In addition:
* breaking established addressing conventions. Gmail (last time I used it) made it difficult to distinguish between To: and Cc:, both in received emails and when sending.
* messed-up quoting, and other broken conventions.
* the one that's been discussed to death here recently: it's on the way to impossible to send email and expect it not to be silently dropped if you're not on gmail.
* the email authenticity measures linked to the last point also screw up mailing lists and forwards. Most of the DMARC notifications I get from gmail now include a bunch of FAILs for people that forward from another domain to gmail. Soon, they'll simply stop receiving most mail.
Email is walking dead, and gmail is largely to blame.
- ViViDboarder 11y agoWhy would Google want it to be easier for you to market via email than paying them for ads?
- cronjobber 11y agoBack in pre-history, they did a similar number on their usenet interface, again after having offered a decent product for long enough to lure people away from running local clients.
- qewrffewqwfqew 11y agoThey killed usenet off good by providing a reasonable interface that encouraged people to link to it .. then destabilising the URLs. I've seen wiki links to google groups that have been changed 3 or 4 times before people simply gave up trying to re-find the original target. Pisses me off no end.