I don't really see you making any arguments here. * Her letter tries to influence the students she had authority over as her position as associate master. It w

I don't really see you making any arguments here. * Her letter tries to influence the students she had authority over as her position as associate master. It was implicitly co-signed by her husband, the master. The letter was only sent to those students. * Most of the rest of the letter has a different questioning rhetoric tone, of course no one can make you see that if you don't want to. * The article shows she had an agenda and wasn't just reacting to the letter. It bring into question whether she is appropriate for the roll as associate masters since she apparently thought promoting her own agenda was more important than good relations to the students.