>We no longer need to 'learn' about eugenics since it's been shown to never fit with the scientific evidence. We've replaced "eugenics" with "editing the human

>We no longer need to 'learn' about eugenics since it's been shown to never fit with the scientific evidence. We've replaced "eugenics" with "editing the human genome". No need to selectively breed and we can still get similar benefits of reducing terminal illnesses and increasing quality of life. It's only a question whether these changes are ethical and many groups oppose these benefits for reasons of "playing god" and secondary effects we may not be aware of. >they lost out to the evidence to the contrary on numerous points (ex. claims that transgender individuals commit more suicide post-GRS has been proven false by numerous studies) Going to need to see those studies. As a trans I opted to not undergo GRS because every single study I've read has shown that increased satisfaction and happiness post-surgery is uncommon and that increased depression, suicidal behavior, unhappiness, and regret are fairly common. Furthermore, I agree with Dr. Paul R. McHugh. Which makes be extremely unpopular among portions of the LGBT crowd. Few doctors would ever agree with Dr. McHugh. I wonder how much of that is out of fear of losing their jobs to a social justice mob if they dared to agree with what he said? This issue is the catalyst for why I'm so vehemently against the PC/SJW crowds. Their bullying tactics and censorship of any information that disagrees with their feelings actively harms people who live in the real world. I can't trust what doctors say when they would be risking their livelihood to make any claims contrary.