3 ms·
> Paper is accepted and set to public (or rejected) Is this even relevant post-scarcity? Just make everything available all the time, just like the rest of the
by xorcist 11y ago
> Paper is accepted and set to public (or rejected)
Is this even relevant post-scarcity? Just make everything available all the time, just like the rest of the web works.
If it is obvious how many citations a paper have, and of their respective quality, that would carry over to make a quality index for the paper itself. Low quality papers would languish as only friends and family would bother with the.
- Fomite 11y agoWhat about a new medical study that hasn't had time to gather citations? What is its "quality index"?
- xorcist 11y agoWhat is its status today, before it is published? It's very low, but there is a system in place to get a select few peers to review it. Could there not be a similar system of reviewers in place, without necessarily making a difference between "published" and "rejected"?