3 ms·

So given the evidence that arbitrators are substantially more biased towards corporations than regular courts are, your argument is that it's actually the court

So given the evidence that arbitrators are substantially more biased towards corporations than regular courts are, your argument is that it's actually the courts that are biased in favor of individuals and the arbitrators are actually perfectly fair and impartial. I suppose that isn't ruled out by the evidence at hand. But isn't it more likely that regular courts, with all their rules about conflict of interest and judges that aren't paid their salary by one side of the dispute are a little more likely to be the fairer ones?

DannyBee 11y ago
"But isn't it more likely that regular courts, with all their rules about conflict of interest and judges that aren't paid their salary by one side of the dispute are a little more likely to be the fairer ones?" In my experience, no ;-) Also, they are paid by one side of the dispute - you pay judges salaries ;-) In a lot of states, they are directly elected, too.