3 ms·
Regardless of what Snowden thinks, evidence submitted doesn't have to be made public. Due to his contractor status, it's unclear which whistleblower protections
by caskance 11y ago
Regardless of what Snowden thinks, evidence submitted doesn't have to be made public. Due to his contractor status, it's unclear which whistleblower protections would cover him, but that's something that can be established during trial. It's clear that Snowden and his supporters believe that a "fair" trial means one where he's exonerated. That's unreasonable.
- Alupis 11y agoYou clearly have not been following the entire story. Selective facts don't tell the entire narrative.
- caskance 11y agoI'm pretty sure I know more than you do here, but I'll humor you. What facts do you think I'm missing?
- fineman 11y agoThen you'd know it's not that the evidence presented at trial would remain sealed but that he wouldn't even be able to present it.
- caskance 11y agoThat's within the context of it being a trial open to the public.
- Alupis 11y ago> That's within the context of it being a trial open to the public. Which the US Government is not allowing. We've looped back to the beginning here... and you still don't understand, don't accept, or don't know the entire narrative.
- fineman 11y agoNo, he won't be able to present evidence at any trial. It's much more than keeping some testimony sealed.