3 ms·
It might be obvious, but this should be read as a pedagogical explanation of fourier transforms, not as a historical account. From in the very end of the articl
by tobr 11y ago
It might be obvious, but this should be read as a pedagogical explanation of fourier transforms, not as a historical account. From in the very end of the article:
> Ok, you may doubt the historical accuracy, but the math is solid!
- carlob 11y agoObviously the round table's Percival/Parsifal is not really the one behind Parseval's theorem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc-Antoine_Parseval https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc-Antoine_Parseval https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percival https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percival