2 ms·
Yes you're right, I misread. I still think the preferred idiom is to use boost::none (like the optional documentation does).
by roel_v 11y ago
Yes you're right, I misread. I still think the preferred idiom is to use boost::none (like the optional documentation does).
- vp2015 11y agoIn fact boost::optional examples use default constructor in this case - at least all examples I've seen, see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_58_0/libs/optional/doc/html/boost_optional/examples.html http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_58_0/libs/optional/doc/html/...