6 ms·
here is the full text for you to examine http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt another post mentions section seven:
by justifier 11y ago
here is the full text for you to examine
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt
another post mentions section seven: Additional Terms; i had to look it up to check the commentator's assertion
i'd suggest explaining in clear terms what you would like to achieve with the licensing of your work
i am sure the people here would be happy to help you find an agreeable license
another resource: http://choosealicense.com/licenses/ http://choosealicense.com/licenses/
- szdszdszd 11y agoOk, I have read section 7 one more time and debates over the internet. As I see many users are unhappy with such type of dual licensing. Which scheme will be perfectly clear for everyone? Will http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for non-commercial/ developer license for commercial be ok for everyone?
- brazzledazzle 11y agoUnless you're a contract lawyer I would always default to assuming the least beneficial outcome for yourself when something isn't clear cut.
- szdszdszd 11y agoSwitched to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/