6 ms·
You'll be able to reverse engineer. Interpreting JS is a massive waste of CPU/battery for the majority of users. The savings is worth a slight increase in compl
by eosrei 11y ago
You'll be able to reverse engineer. Interpreting JS is a massive waste of CPU/battery for the majority of users. The savings is worth a slight increase in complexity for developers.
- pdkl95 11y agoThe solution to high CPU/battery usage is to send a static page. Invoking a new type of VM may help slightly, but it probably just moves the problem around.
- Ace17 11y agoA static page ? What about games? Are you advocating to go back to Adobe Flash?
- sp332 11y agoThere's no reason to limit the web to static pages. How would you do this with a static page https://benedikt-bitterli.me/tantalum/tantalum.html https://benedikt-bitterli.me/tantalum/tantalum.html ? Or http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/05/03/upshot/the-best-and-worst-places-to-grow-up-how-your-area-compares.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/05/03/upshot/the-bes... Or https://play.freeciv.org/ https://play.freeciv.org/ Or anything on this page http://www.kongregate.com/ http://www.kongregate.com/ or, you know, Facebook or Twitter or Google Maps/Books/Docs/Photos...?