> This isn't even fake science, this is just a piece designed to generate outrage. It's quite a cognitive leap from "I think there's a methodology flaw" to "th

> This isn't even fake science, this is just a piece designed to generate outrage. It's quite a cognitive leap from "I think there's a methodology flaw" to "this is just a piece designed to generate outrage". Note that this flaw is discussed in the 'limitations' section of the paper.