3 ms·

> ...our system has become increasingly hostile to "real" investigative journalism... The burden of proof that there has been a degradation of information qual

by ysilver 11y ago

> ...our system has become increasingly hostile to "real" investigative journalism... The burden of proof that there has been a degradation of information quality remains on your side of the court. This "lost paradise" argument may very well be right but it's far from evident to me. I would broadly characterize media quality as always having been low on average throughout history. We had a brief period of oligopoly after mass media (the networks) monopolized a lot of what we call news but that period was more of an exception to the rule (and it certainly had its own problems).

exelius 11y ago
I'm not talking about media quality like it's something that has just recently gotten bad. I don't think it's gotten worse; but the mass media is also no less important now than in the past. I realize it's always been an issue; I'm just saying we can't act high and mighty relative to Russia because it's a problem here too.
- ysilver 11y ago
  I think you're smart to try to test the validity of the converse of my claims. However, it's also important to acknowledge that there is enormous variation in the freedom of the media to operate across countries. There are highly repressive media domains where a single actor represses others and achieves a near monopoly. Could the US improve freedom of expression domestically? Yes. Do we systematically repress dissenters as is common Russia, Bangladesh, etc? No
  - tremon 11y ago
    > Do we systematically repress dissenters as is common Russia, Bangladesh, etc? Yes, you do. Every time an American uses "communism" or "communist" in a discussion, he is exploiting the systemic oppression of non-capitalist movements in the US. Your propaganda machine is quite effective in deriding any political view that clashes with the extreme right-wing capitalist view that keeps your power structures in place.
    - tremon 11y ago
      lol. What a perfect response to illustrate my point :)
    - ysilver 11y ago
      I read that comment three times and have no idea what you are trying to say. ps. It's kind of fun to be called "right-wing"
tremon 11y ago
> The burden of proof that there has been a degradation of information quality remains on your side of the court The USA fell 13 places in Reporters Without Borders' 2014 annual ranking of press freedom: "Countries that pride themselves on being democracies and respecting the rule of law have not set an example, far from it. Freedom of information is too often sacrificed to an overly broad and abusive interpretation of national security needs, marking a disturbing retreat from democratic practices. Investigative journalism often suffers as a result. This has been the case in the United States (46th), which fell 13 places, one of the most significant declines, amid increased efforts to track down whistleblowers and the sources of leaks. The trial and conviction of Private Bradley Manning and the pursuit of NSA analyst Edward Snowden were warnings to all those thinking of assisting in the disclosure of sensitive information that would clearly be in the public interest. US journalists were stunned by the Department of Justice’s seizure of Associated Press phone records without warning in order to identify the source of a CIA leak. It served as a reminder of the urgent need for a “shield law” to protect the confidentiality of journalists’ sources at the federal level. The revival of the legislative process is little consolation for James Risen of The New York Times, who is subject to a court order to testify against a former CIA employee accused of leaking classified information. And less still for Barrett Brown, a young freelance journalist facing 105 years in prison in connection with the posting of information that hackers obtained from Statfor, a private intelligence company with close ties to the federal government." http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php
- ysilver 11y ago
  History may show that we are digesting something akin to McCarthyism right now.
  - Kristine1975 11y ago
    If that's the case, it's much more subtle: No HUAC, no blacklisting, no "are you or have you ever been a member of...?"
    - ysilver 11y ago

by ysilver 11y ago

exelius 11y ago

I'm not talking about media quality like it's something that has just recently gotten bad. I don't think it's gotten worse; but the mass media is also no less important now than in the past. I realize it's always been an issue; I'm just saying we can't act high and mighty relative to Russia because it's a problem here too.

ysilver 11y ago
I think you're smart to try to test the validity of the converse of my claims. However, it's also important to acknowledge that there is enormous variation in the freedom of the media to operate across countries. There are highly repressive media domains where a single actor represses others and achieves a near monopoly. Could the US improve freedom of expression domestically? Yes. Do we systematically repress dissenters as is common Russia, Bangladesh, etc? No
- tremon 11y ago
  > Do we systematically repress dissenters as is common Russia, Bangladesh, etc? Yes, you do. Every time an American uses "communism" or "communist" in a discussion, he is exploiting the systemic oppression of non-capitalist movements in the US. Your propaganda machine is quite effective in deriding any political view that clashes with the extreme right-wing capitalist view that keeps your power structures in place.
  - tremon 11y ago
    lol. What a perfect response to illustrate my point :)
  - ysilver 11y ago
    I read that comment three times and have no idea what you are trying to say. ps. It's kind of fun to be called "right-wing"

tremon 11y ago

> The burden of proof that there has been a degradation of information quality remains on your side of the court The USA fell 13 places in Reporters Without Borders' 2014 annual ranking of press freedom: "Countries that pride themselves on being democracies and respecting the rule of law have not set an example, far from it. Freedom of information is too often sacrificed to an overly broad and abusive interpretation of national security needs, marking a disturbing retreat from democratic practices. Investigative journalism often suffers as a result. This has been the case in the United States (46th), which fell 13 places, one of the most significant declines, amid increased efforts to track down whistleblowers and the sources of leaks. The trial and conviction of Private Bradley Manning and the pursuit of NSA analyst Edward Snowden were warnings to all those thinking of assisting in the disclosure of sensitive information that would clearly be in the public interest. US journalists were stunned by the Department of Justice’s seizure of Associated Press phone records without warning in order to identify the source of a CIA leak. It served as a reminder of the urgent need for a “shield law” to protect the confidentiality of journalists’ sources at the federal level. The revival of the legislative process is little consolation for James Risen of The New York Times, who is subject to a court order to testify against a former CIA employee accused of leaking classified information. And less still for Barrett Brown, a young freelance journalist facing 105 years in prison in connection with the posting of information that hackers obtained from Statfor, a private intelligence company with close ties to the federal government." http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php

ysilver 11y ago
History may show that we are digesting something akin to McCarthyism right now.
- Kristine1975 11y ago
  If that's the case, it's much more subtle: No HUAC, no blacklisting, no "are you or have you ever been a member of...?"
  - ysilver 11y ago