2 ms·
You're equating professional harassment regarding an external subject to sexual harassment within an internal workplace. I don't think this is appropriate here
by FilterSweep 11y ago
You're equating professional harassment regarding an external subject to sexual harassment within an internal workplace.
I don't think this is appropriate here, in the least bit. Not only is it distasteful, but it also was a poorly posited example that failed to even make the same connection to "bear poking"
- jamespo 11y agoSo as long as harrassment isn't sexual or "internal" it's OK. Right.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- orf 11y ago> that failed to even make the same connection to "bear poking" Office worker X wears an attractive dress to work one day. It's within her right to do so and is not breaking any rules. Officer worker Y comes over, drops his trousers and says "Want to poke my bear?". Journalist X makes a statement about Russia. It's within her right to do so and not breaking any rules. Russian Shill Y comes over and says "Fuck you, here's a torrent of abuse for many months". In both cases the bear got provoked by something the subject did, by making a statement with her clothes or her words. But you're saying in both cases it's her fault that the bear got provoked and she shouldn't do it?