> I don't think he's being insightful at all. All his observations seem to be shallow and his conclusions are weak. Thank you; you put it better than I could.

> I don't think he's being insightful at all. All his observations seem to be shallow and his conclusions are weak. Thank you; you put it better than I could. A small example that demolishes his crackpot theory: we just had a kid a few weeks ago. We have a cat, who has never been around children, and who has never had children. And yet, when the child cries, the cat comes running; and if the cries do not subside soon enough, she'll start howling. And then there's this example: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30893297 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30893297 Is the cat following some religion too? Hogwash.