4 ms·

I'm not opposing his theory, I'm opposing his language.

• ThomPete 11y ago
  You could have made the same argument with Darwin back then. Thats my point. Creating another word doesn't provide the perspective he is trying to achieve. His challenge isn't going to be clarity but like Darwin to get people even to accept the idea that it's the same.
  • mrob 11y ago
    It's not the same, because "nature" is a common English word, but "evolution" was an obscure technical term before Darwin redefined it. His redefinition did very little harm to clarity of communication.
    • ThomPete 11y ago
      Its not evolution but humans as animals i am talking about