4 ms·
Just what http://shapecatcher.com/ http://shapecatcher.com/ put out in a few minutes seems to render more reliable as a compromise than the proposed composition
by mxfh 11y ago
Just what http://shapecatcher.com/ http://shapecatcher.com/ put out in a few minutes seems to render more reliable as a compromise than the proposed composition Ƭ̵̬̊.
Ŧ̊ (Latin capital letter t with stroke + combining ring above) or Ankh, ቶ (Ethiopic syllable to) or even simply the female sign with caret?*
All seem way safer to render than this. With more than one Combining Diacritical Mark Ŧ̬ͦ it's seems quite impossible to tell how this will be rendered in different browsers.
* why does HN filter for the female sign 0x2640 and Ankh?
- TazeTSchnitzel 11y ago> *(why does HN filter for the female sign?) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10156894 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10156894
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- galago 11y agoHN needs to provide some kind of exception for discussions specifically about Unicode--which may contain examples.