5 ms·

You don't need a special font installed. It works fine in Chrome on OS X without anything extra installed.

• mxfh 11y ago
  Just what http://shapecatcher.com/ http://shapecatcher.com/ put out in a few minutes seems to render more reliable as a compromise than the proposed composition Ƭ̵̬̊. Ŧ̊ (Latin capital letter t with stroke + combining ring above) or Ankh, ቶ (Ethiopic syllable to) or even simply the female sign with caret?* All seem way safer to render than this. With more than one Combining Diacritical Mark Ŧ̬ͦ it's seems quite impossible to tell how this will be rendered in different browsers. * why does HN filter for the female sign 0x2640 and Ankh?
  • TazeTSchnitzel 11y ago
    > *(why does HN filter for the female sign?) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10156894 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10156894
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    • galago 11y ago
      HN needs to provide some kind of exception for discussions specifically about Unicode--which may contain examples.
• nevdka 11y ago
  It even displays correctly in Notepad in Windows 7.
• SchizoDuckie 11y ago
  Looks like this on Chrome Ubuntu. I'm not impressed http://imgur.com/KlHdZ47 http://imgur.com/KlHdZ47
  • Pxtl 11y ago
    Looks about the same on Android Chrome.
  • detaro 11y ago
    Firefox on windows 7 is slightly worse.
• dv35z 11y ago
  Looks completely broken — This is on Chrome (46.0.2490.80), Mac OS X (10.10.5): http://imgur.com/bC1n1sA http://imgur.com/bC1n1sA