3 ms·
>Long before we reach strong AI will it be affecting what we are talking about here. I see absolutely no reason for this. Evolution does not mean development,
by vlehto 11y ago
>Long before we reach strong AI will it be affecting what we are talking about here.
I see absolutely no reason for this. Evolution does not mean development, just adaptation. It doesn't really predict anything alone. Everything imaginable about hard AI suggests revolution rather than evolution.
>There are plenty of alternatives to unanbomber
What alternatives? You probably cannot control strong AI in any meaningful way if it can access internet. Going back to 80's isn't really full unabomber, but anyhow drastic measure.
- ThomPete 11y agoYou se no reason for what? That computers keep getting better? That technology keeps improving beyond were we are now? That AI will improve, that we have just seen the beginning of what AI allow us to do ex. trough deep learning. Really?
- vlehto 11y agoI see no reason why computers getting better would fundamentally change the economy. They make everything more efficient, sure. But it's still about humans trying to gain resources at the individual level. And humans distributing resources to other humans at systemic level. Slave trade didn't fundamentally change economy. Except for slaves themselves. So until human is more intelligent than computer, things should remain the same.
- ThomPete 11y agoWell of course you see no reason for that. You are looking at it from an economic perspective not a technological one. And so until you change that perspective you will keep applying the same ideas of incentives to your thinking. Humans wont need to either gain resources or distribute it. Instead some will just own those resources and the system that distributes it sans the humans.
- vlehto 11y agoYou really wish to win an argument.