4 ms·
As I expected, I can follow it until it gets to monads. The thing about explaining monads isn't even a joke anymore, it's just become mundane reality It says t
by draw_down 11y ago
As I expected, I can follow it until it gets to monads. The thing about explaining monads isn't even a joke anymore, it's just become mundane reality
It says that (.) is the same thing as (>=>). Fine, but then why are we talking about (<=<) and (=<<) instead of (id) and (.) now?
- tome 11y agoThe point of the article is that even though function composition and monadic composition are made out of different things ((.) and id versus (<=<) and return respectively) they have the same underlying structure: associative composition with identity.