3 ms·
It's more practical for both of you eg. there's no fixed amount required/it's optional (if you're short on cash for eg.) and the driver gets spendable cash righ
by moonchrome 11y ago
It's more practical for both of you eg. there's no fixed amount required/it's optional (if you're short on cash for eg.) and the driver gets spendable cash right there - doesn't have to report anything or wait for a paycheck - which matters a lot more when you're doing low paying jobs.
- maxerickson 11y agoThat you can still order when you are short on cash is a great argument against leaving the tip up to the customer (the driver gets screwed on ~100% of those orders). (In USA, the delivery person probably can't get away with reporting nothing to the IRS, they will have to declare some tip income or risk getting chased around)
- moonchrome 11y ago> That you can still order when you are short on cash is a great argument against leaving the tip up to the customer (the driver gets screwed on ~100% of those orders). If you get paid in tips only sure but around here it's minimum wage + tips. No-tip order still pays to your employer - of course it sucks for you but it still keeps the business going. >(In USA, the delivery person probably can't get away with reporting nothing to the IRS, they will have to declare some tip income or risk getting chased around) I meant reporting to the owner and waiting to get the money back trough paycheck.