3 ms·
Part 1) This is according merely to an FBI affidavit [1] applying for a search warrant, much less a charge or conviction. Roberts has claimed he was misrepresen
by briandh 11y ago
Part 1) This is according merely to an FBI affidavit [1] applying for a search warrant, much less a charge or conviction. Roberts has claimed he was misrepresented, albeit understandably coyly [2]. "Yes" is an uncritical answer.
[1] http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Chris-Roberts-Application-for-Search-Warrant.pdf http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Chris-Robert...
[2] http://www.slideshare.net/EC-Council/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-airport-chris-roberts http://www.slideshare.net/EC-Council/a-funny-thing-happened-... (slide 10; apropos nothing, this was a very boring and actually mildly annoying talk)