> Do you advocate for eugenics so that smarter genes get further? For that you might first want an equal beginning for every semen-sack and ovary. Currently nob

> Do you advocate for eugenics so that smarter genes get further? For that you might first want an equal beginning for every semen-sack and ovary. Currently nobody has good idea who has the "smart genes" and who has just good upbringing. No, I cannot earnestly support eugenics. I just think society doesn't need any given couple to have more than x number of children and if people want x + n children, they should be able to fully fund for the rearing of the n children themselves. Personally, I believe that the ceiling for x should be no greater than 2.