2 ms·
Productivity gains imply that the architect must know the workflow in detail. Stories about students living in a hospital for some weeks to acknowledge the subt
by galfarragem 11y ago
Productivity gains imply that the architect must know the workflow in detail. Stories about students living in a hospital for some weeks to acknowledge the subtleties of the workflow are rather common in academia but in the real world things are hard to put in practice: time constraints, work-life balance, squeezed budgets (in most industries) and subjectivity (hard to quantify productivity/happiness gains before building it) make change very hard. R&D in architecture is already fueled by architecture interns working pro bono.
Normally the higher you go in an hierarchy the more conservative it gets till you get answers like:
I completely agree with you but without an open layout how do I control my employees?
With an open layout I can put more people in less space.
This is what most business people think. All the rest is poetry.
edit: best office concept I know: http://www.angelinthenorth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Glass-walled-office-in-woodland-of-Selgas-Cano-architects-Madrid.jpg http://www.angelinthenorth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Gl...
- vlehto 11y agoOK, how do you know that's the best office? Students sleeping in a hospital gives them the feel of how it is. Then they can argument their position better. While they really don't know if people are going to be healthier in their design. This is exactly what I was talking about. You can measure if it's good. Have you?