3 ms·
> If you wanted to keep them private, all you had to do was nothing. You are advocating for the complete repression of any idea that hasn't yet become both kno
by pdkl95 11y ago
> If you wanted to keep them private, all you had to do was nothing.
You are advocating for the complete repression of any idea that hasn't yet become both known and acceptable to the mainstream.
It's not going to always be pictures of your dick. To name just a few of the most obvious groups with real risks, you're effectively saying that anybody with unpopular political views, anybody LGBT, and anybody with a religious belief that isn't "Christian" shouldn't participate in modern society and the network interactions that participation requires if they want to stay safe?
Blaming the victims for not staying out of sight isn't the solution.
- fineman 11y agoEspecially because governments don't go repressive overnight. What's perfectly reasonable today may not be in ten years. (Example, Iran.)
- caskance 11y agoNo, I'm not. No clue how you got there. If you have an unpopular view, speak out. Be oppressed. Fight back against the oppression if you can, and roll over and die if you cannot. If you win, your side is and always was right. If you lose, the opposite.
- dTal 11y agoYou are saying that oppression is part of the natural order, and that the winners always have the moral high ground. I find your Nietzschen worldview abhorrent.
- caskance 11y agoAgain, no I'm not. And I find your implication that I believe or care about such a thing as a "natural order" abhorrent. You're not very good at this reading thing, are you?