3 ms·
First, no, that data is only for full-time, year-round employees. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/people/2014/p36AR.xls https://www.cens
by hodwik 11y ago
First, no, that data is only for full-time, year-round employees.
https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/people/2014/p36AR.xls https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/peopl...
Second, employees are working less hours now than before, so if you think that line of argumentation flies, it actually supports my position -- adding an additional 12.5% to per capita median income per hour. https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/AVHWPEUSA065NRUG https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/AVHWPEUSA065NRU...
- gozo 11y agoYou keep missing the point. Women traditionally worked low paying jobs, like housekeeper or nanny. The increased participation of women in the workforce mean that women now work higher paying jobs. It does not mean that that someone has gotten more real pay for the same job. The numbers you linked to on worked hours still hasn't had meaningful change since the '80s. If your point is that things got better until the '70s or '80s but not since, well then I agree with your point. But like I said there are of course many factors, like men are probably working less hours, but on the other hand underemployment has gone up.