4 ms·
Check out Hans Rosling. Number of children in the world has stopped growing. Do you advocate for eugenics so that smarter genes get further? For that you might
by vlehto 11y ago
Check out Hans Rosling. Number of children in the world has stopped growing.
Do you advocate for eugenics so that smarter genes get further? For that you might first want an equal beginning for every semen-sack and ovary. Currently nobody has good idea who has the "smart genes" and who has just good upbringing.
I think that if we actually get to the situation of relative equality and there is some coherent "smart genes" at play, then human specie would naturally split into homo engineers and homo welfares.
Anyhow, genuine UBI would be what you should want too.
- newjersey 11y ago> Do you advocate for eugenics so that smarter genes get further? For that you might first want an equal beginning for every semen-sack and ovary. Currently nobody has good idea who has the "smart genes" and who has just good upbringing. No, I cannot earnestly support eugenics. I just think society doesn't need any given couple to have more than x number of children and if people want x + n children, they should be able to fully fund for the rearing of the n children themselves. Personally, I believe that the ceiling for x should be no greater than 2.