It would be beneficial to quantify exactly what about a certain vegetable is good, and to compare it to others. That way, you could obtain the most nutritional

It would be beneficial to quantify exactly what about a certain vegetable is good, and to compare it to others. That way, you could obtain the most nutritional value within certain constraints. Perhaps a certain vegetable is known to provide the most nutrients for the longest storage time. This could benefit people in third-world countries, whose food storage is at a premium. I get it, you're disillusioned with people who demand scientific evidence uber alles. But the approach has its benefits. And what you may think is obvious because it was true in the past may be proven wrong. What I don't understand is that you seem to be asking for people to think less critically. We should end science and just return to the olden times? Some of your argument makes a lot of sense to me (sharing lawnmowers with our neighbors rather than owning them entirely). But you also ask people to act without knowledge. Your argument doesn't offer much in the way of solutions besides immediately acting without data.