4 ms·
> I recall listening to a vinyl rip of Lady Gaga's first album, and found that "Pokerface" was much more enjoyable with the additional dynamic range. I was ske
by chimeracoder 11y ago
> I recall listening to a vinyl rip of Lady Gaga's first album, and found that "Pokerface" was much more enjoyable with the additional dynamic range.
I was skeptical of this, so I sought out a copy on Youtube[0]. "Better" is subjective, and this is definitely lower quality overall (given the Youtube compression). But it is undeniably a very different song. I've listened to the CD version of this song countless times, and I don't think I ever remember hearing the male voice in the intro so prominently.
For someone hearing the song for the first time (or even the first few), it may not be as obvious, but as someone who's used to hearing that song on a regular basis, it definitely jumps out as having a crisper sound.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98AgdAkjOjo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98AgdAkjOjo
- __david__ 11y agoTo me it just sounds like the original song put through a high pass filter. All the subwoofer bass that makes it a dance song is just gone. That's not lack of loudness war style compression, it's mostly sounds like bad equipment. There's a major 60hz ground loop in there, too.