These very threats pretty much sum up the type of officers that Tarantino spoke against in the first place. The irony here is strong. I don't like the way the P

These very threats pretty much sum up the type of officers that Tarantino spoke against in the first place. The irony here is strong. I don't like the way the Police Union is going about this. The police are supposed to be the impartial protectors of the law here. If valuable resources are being wasted exacting some kind of childish revenge on Tarantino instead of catching criminals, this is going to backfire on them quite badly. What does the police union expect to achieve? Do they want Tarantino to publicly retract his statements and say, "The police should have the right to kill unarmed citizens if they want" - I don't see what the point of this is. Also Tarantino is not the only person to speak out against police brutality, why are they singling him out, because he has a following and they're scared people will listen to what he has to say? This whole situation is appalling. Maybe if the police union encouraged its members to be better at their jobs, to apprehend criminals using minimal force (unless otherwise required) maybe Tarantino wouldn't have said we he said. Maybe people would trust the police more and we wouldn't be in this situation.