3 ms·
Those others felt compelled to contribute because John refused to specify MD with anything other than a incomplete blog post and a buggy perl implementation. I
by Hupriene 11y ago
Those others felt compelled to contribute because John refused to specify MD with anything other than a incomplete blog post and a buggy perl implementation. If this isn't an example of community involvement exceeding maintainer willingness to advance the project, I don't know what is.
- nothrabannosir 11y agoThis is not about community involvement, but about the maintainer's responsibility to stay active: "you should only release what you're willing to maintain" The Markdown story was not about that. Nobody demanded John's involvement; all people wanted was for him to let the project go. That's a far cry from "willing to maintain."
- falcolas 11y ago> all people wanted was for him to let the project go Why should he have to do even that? It's his project to do with what he pleases. Work on it, horde it, release it under the AGPL... it's his, nobody else's. Of course, that's not their impression. Their impression, and the general expectation, is that if someone open sources code, they do so expressly for the good of the community of developers. You see this quite a bit in GPL discussions as well.