3 ms·
I'm curious why people singled out Eich vs say Ed Catmull. If I understand correctly Catmull is a practicing Mormon which means he gives 10% of his gross income
by greggman 11y ago
I'm curious why people singled out Eich vs say Ed Catmull. If I understand correctly Catmull is a practicing Mormon which means he gives 10% of his gross income to a church that has been strongly anti LGBT rights. I haven't noticed a big movement trying to get him to resign from Pixar or to boycott Pixar or Disney.
Do I have my facts wrong?
Is there something that makes Eich's situation different than Catmull's?
If I understood the difference I feel like I'd be more enlightened.
- gaius 11y agoBecause the mob doesn't actually care about the actual people or even the issue. They just want to see someone, anyone lynched.
- matthewmacleod 11y agoThere could be many reasons for this. 1. Pixar is a private for-profit company, while Mozilla is at least in part a political nonprofit. For obvious reasons, people are more concerned about the political positions in such a case. 2. I suspect that many people would find the act of donating to a religious body, which holds a wide-ranging diversity of opinions on many subject (not all of which an individual may agree with) as distinct from the explicit act of making a donation for one specific political aim.