> I can't answer this question, because "components" is too vague a word. You could be talking about software components, or mechanical components, or financial

> I can't answer this question, because "components" is too vague a word. You could be talking about software components, or mechanical components, or financial instruments... sorry, I just don't know what you're getting at here. I meant literal electronic and mechanical components. > An unlicensed engineer is not allowed to identify as the engineer-of-record for contractual purposes; that is, they can no longer 'stamp the drawings.' Correct. However, firms operating under a Certificate of Authority do not require a specific engineer to 'stamp the drawings'; the firm itself can do so. This is common with respect to mass-produced consumer goods and things of that general nature. None of the engineers who actually did the work need to be licensed, but they are still engineers. The CA thing may be unique to the US, though. > I completely agree with your assessment, except that I don't see CS as being B. A. material, since it's basically applied mathematics, which has traditionally been B. Sc. territory. I was getting confused by the BA in Physics. You are right, in that the BS in Physics is what you take if you want to "do physics", so a BSCS would still be appropriate for those who want to "do computer science".