3 ms·
Or worse, they start running the law on a computer. Instead of human interpreters, they'll just run their models and say, oh, the computer says you're guilty.
by rquantz 11y ago
Or worse, they start running the law on a computer. Instead of human interpreters, they'll just run their models and say, oh, the computer says you're guilty.
- Retra 11y agoYou don't make the computer output "guilty." You make it show you a likeliness of violation and a history of enforcements along with the relevance mitigating factors.
- rquantz 11y agoBut that doesn't sound as good as a dystopian science fiction story :)
- digikata 11y agoAs long as we can hire our own advocate/model to provide a defensive analysis, we might be ok...