4 ms·
Yeah but I'm sure Katy Perry gets enough out of the service to pay it $10k a year. For example. Total revenue would be lower, yes, but that should be matched b
by m52go 11y ago
Yeah but I'm sure Katy Perry gets enough out of the service to pay it $10k a year. For example.
Total revenue would be lower, yes, but that should be matched by cost-cutting. These companies' head-counts are bloated compared to the services they offer.
I know there's a lot more to Twitter than the simplistic short-messaging system it seems to be from the outside (speed, scaling, etc)...but does it really need over 4,000 people to run it? I highly doubt it.
- matart 11y agoThis sounds like charging someone to bring you business. Katy Perry convinces a lot of people to use twitter and still has to pay to bring in revenue. If this was the same for car sales, why would anyone recommend cars?
- mosquito242 11y agoYeah but that's a very risky move. If even 50% of the power users pay, then twitter still loses 50% of it's key content, which costs it users, which then means the remaining power users are less interested in paying and so on.
- notahacker 11y ago$10k a year to keep advertising not sanctioned by Katy Perry's management off her Twitter feed might get a bite or two....