3 ms·
I take it you've had a bad experience with ActiveAdmin? Even with its "DSL" (I wouldn't call it a DSL) it's pretty customisable and can do pretty much anything
by seivan 11y ago
I take it you've had a bad experience with ActiveAdmin?
Even with its "DSL" (I wouldn't call it a DSL) it's pretty customisable and can do pretty much anything brought up in the article here http://activeadmin.info/docs/documentation.html http://activeadmin.info/docs/documentation.html
- bshimmin 11y agoRailsAdmin's "automatic" nature is a big win for us, whereas with ActiveAdmin we would have to write some code (even if it is easy code) to get us to the same point. For some of our projects RailsAdmin in its default state does the job excellently, without any fiddling; for other projects it starts out well and then goes downhill from there...