3 ms·
Depending the place I looked, a testing heart rate of 89 may be a cause for concern. Some places say anywhere up to 100 is 'normal' but this one says over 85 is
by Spare_account 11y ago
Depending the place I looked, a testing heart rate of 89 may be a cause for concern. Some places say anywhere up to 100 is 'normal' but this one says over 85 is 'poor' (you may want to consider improving your fitness levels): http://www.topendsports.com/testing/heart-rate-resting-chart.htm http://www.topendsports.com/testing/heart-rate-resting-chart...
- debacle 11y agoI agree with Spare_account. Anything over 75 is cause for concern. You may want to speak with your doctor.
- BjoernKW 11y agoThat's just wrong. 60 to 80 is ok and the average healthy heart rate also varies by gender and age.
- gburt 11y agoBy the sounds of it he was standing at the sink in order to do this. That's not "resting" for the sake of a resting heart rate. Edit: for instance, I just tested mine from sitting (at my desk) to standing beside my desk it increases 25 points, on the linked chart going from "athlete" to "below average."
- Spare_account 11y agoTru dat. Awyu can relax after all.
- BjoernKW 11y agoEverything from 60 to 80 is normal. 89 is slightly high but usually is not a cause for concern in medical terms. The site you mentioned is about sports and fitness. So, while 89 isn't exactly great in terms of fitness, taken by itself it doesn't point to a medical condition.