If you read the heading on the table you refer to, you would have seen that its title is "Candidate outcomes based on potential non-absentee recounts in Florida

If you read the heading on the table you refer to, you would have seen that its title is "Candidate outcomes based on potential non-absentee recounts in Florida presidential election 2000". Absentee ballots do matter, and the court was never even asked to do a statewide recount (to the best of my knowledge). In addition to that, Gore would not have won on an full recount based on the conventional standards for a vote (two corners of the chad punched), as is made clear later in the article, by papers like the New York Times.