3 ms·
> Modern C++ ..., and would have been much more productive than go. This is definitely not correct. Any GC language with even the most basic packaging support
by arthursilva 11y ago
> Modern C++ ..., and would have been much more productive than go.
This is definitely not correct. Any GC language with even the most basic packaging support (go get etc.) is miles ahead of C++ productivity wise.
- dman 11y agoDepends on the problem at hand - if youre talking about code that is not performance / memory sensitive then sure.
- maccard 11y agoWhy does package support make it more productive than c++? For most c++ libraries you download the source, build it (platform dependent) and set includes/libs and youre done. More so, you only tend to mess with dependencies infrequently, so who cares if it takes an extra 5 minutes once every 6 months?