> The article seems to make a lot of very dubious claims about Java. I was also stumped by this confidence in that Go is supposed to be better than Java perfor

> The article seems to make a lot of very dubious claims about Java. I was also stumped by this confidence in that Go is supposed to be better than Java performance-wise and I do think that the claims warrant some proof. However: > Modern C++ ... would have been much more productive than go. I'm not up to date on current C++, but this seems like a claim much like the ones you objected to. Could you elaborate on how C++ is a more productive language (in this case?)?