Well, my conclusion was there to indicate no bad faith despite my short rebuttals. Paul is considered slightly insane because of his visions and unreproducible

Well, my conclusion was there to indicate no bad faith despite my short rebuttals. Paul is considered slightly insane because of his visions and unreproducible-by-christians claims of healing and snake-immunity etc. If you don't want to have a debate then fine, but respond to any of my points properly and I can reply with sources, arguments, counter examples or other contemporary evidence.