and so should an investor in a privately owned company. the "shareholder" could be an employee with equity and no voting rights, in which case the article is j

and so should an investor in a privately owned company. the "shareholder" could be an employee with equity and no voting rights, in which case the article is just here to surf on the buzz surrounding theranos and adding to the bad press. Or it could be a meaningful investor, in which case he/she should be blaming noone but him/herself for not reading the fine prints/asking a lawyer